Zwillingssterns Weltenwald
Published on Zwillingssterns Weltenwald (https://www.draketo.de)

Startseite > You cannot afford 1% predators

You cannot afford 1% predators

The discussion about sexual assault at conferences has been going on for a few years now. Moral reasoning has been discussed a lot, and I will not repeat that.1

Here I will give a dispassionate, cold and calculating reason why your community cannot afford to tolerate 1% predators:

If in a community of 50 men and 50 women, one person is a predator who attacks one woman every year and causes her to leave, and every year either a man or a woman joins, the community will be male-only after 100 years.

Even 1% predators is far too much.

To take this apart:

  • I assume that interest in the topic is equal between men and women.
  • I assume that the community starts out with 50 men and 50 women.
  • Now I add a single predator who attacks one woman every year.
  • The woman subsequently leaves.
  • One new person joins to take her place. Since interest is assumed equal, there’s a 50% chance that it’s a woman and a 50% chance that it’s a man.
  • Overall the community therefore loses one woman every second year.
  • Within 100 years there will be no single woman left in the community.

Therefore no community can afford to tolerate even one predator per 100 people — regardless of how the predator causes women to leave.

Even 1% predators cause massive structural discrimination. If you tolerate those 1% of people, you lose 50% of your community — and, all moral issues aside, no community should burn half their members for the sake of the 1% who might be predators.

Note that most people in such a community won’t notice the predatory behavior, simply because most of the time they will only interact in smaller subgroups of 5 to 10 people. If in a community of 100 people more than 10 people noticed something odd, that’s a big red flag that there might be a predator in the group who could hurt and drive away half the community if not stopped.

PS: The same goes with the genders reversed: Anyone who makes one person of one specific gender leave every year can effectively render a community single-gender. Violence by men is more frequent, so it’s a bigger problem: 80% of violence in relationships is against women [1]. But ignoring the violence conducted by women would also mean to ignore predators.


  1. Just read the following twitter thread if you need a refresher on the moral issues: So I was at an academic conference this weekend and had to physically intervene to prevent a sexual assault by a male colleague on a female colleague who was drunk to the point that she was clearly not in control of herself, and unable to exercise judgment or consent. — Brad Simpson (@bradleyrsimpson) (June 22, 2018) [2] ↩

Werke von Arne Babenhauserheide. Lizensiert, wo nichts anderes steht, unter der GPLv3 or later und weiteren freien Lizenzen.

Diese Seite nutzt Cookies. Und Bilder. Manchmal auch Text. Eins davon muss ich wohl erwähnen — sagen die meisten anderen, und ich habe grade keine Zeit, Rechtstexte dazu zu lesen…


Source URL: https://www.draketo.de/english/politics/predators

Links:
[1] https://www.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de/im-fokus/wenn-frauen-gewalt-erfahren-nur-weil-sie-frauen-sind
[2] https://twitter.com/bradleyrsimpson/status/1010247868219879426