This is a funding proposal I sent to Open Technology Fund to make Freenet suitable for Journalists and their sources. Sadly it got rejected, but maybe it helps future proposals.
Project name: Freenet for Journalists
Duration: 24 months
Contact name: Arne Babenhauserheide
Contact email: arne_bab -ät- web -punkt- de
Freenet is the only tool to date which addresses all technical requirements for freedom of the press:
However, despite providing the technical foundation for real freedom of the press, Freenet is much too hard to use. Solutions to its usability problems are known, but they need to be implemented, which requires considerable focused effort and coordination with journalists to ensure that the implemented solutions fit the requirements of journalists.
The Freenet for Journalists project is about this focused effort: Making the capabilities of Freenet usable for journalists and sources, so an employee at a military contractor who finds out about illegal activity no longer has to leave the country or rely on large media organizations before blowing the whistle (to stay safe from retribution of the employer).
Making Freenet easier to use for Journalists and whistleblowers requires technical work:
Also it requires coordination with and training for journalists to ensure that the workflows we enable integrate well with their workflows.
To tackle this, we asked Asher Wolf, original organizer of the crypto parties, whether she would join the team as community coordinator and trainer if we get funding. She said she would join up (but we need to have funding first: she has a child to support). Also we will collaborate with Glyn Moody who has 30 years of experience in journalism.
To increase user adoption, this project will tackle the main issues we identified as limiting adoption:
We are confident that with a team of at least three developers and a community-coordinator and trainer, we can realize that within two years. Plans for this are already made and we have the people, all we need is sufficient funding so we can lay down our day jobs and focus on doing what we believe is needed to regain confidential communication in the digitalspace.
The project is for Journalists and their sources.
It will allow people who aren’t yet under targeted surveillance to contact journalists without exposing their identity. It does not matter whether the journalist is under targeted surveillance.
Freenet as leaking platform makes journalists independent from large infrastructure. Journalists often write for several publishers, but platforms like SecureDrop bind them to centralized communication. They are a single point of failure. The same is true for services using Tor to anonymize sources: Here the journalist must run a server which can withstand serious attacks.
In Freenet all nodes in the system collaborate to allow exchanging information confidentially and pseudonymously without making any node a central point of failure.
The core design principle of Freenet is providing Freedom of the Press, and all its features derive from that principle:
“There is now no shield from forced exposure…The foundation of Groklaw is over…the Internet is over” –Groklaw, Forced Exposure(2013-08-20)
The internet once broke the structural information control from the powerful and as such created the opportunity to strengthen democracy against existing concentrations of power. Total surveillance reverts this because it forces everyone to self-censor communication. There is no longer a way to communicate without exposing the physical identity to strong attackers. Even Tor users can be de-anonymized quickly, for example by breaking servers which provide the services.
Due to the pervasive infiltration of digital communication into day-to-day life, this affects analog communication more and more.
Other services like /TorChat/, /Signal/, /Globaleaks/ and /SecureDrop/ all require some degree of centralization and lack censorship-resistant anti-spam methods (Freenet already provides the latter, due to experiencing how anonymous communication breaks down when it lacks spam resistance). Additionally these other services contain vectors for censorship:
Freenet on the other hand is designed for asynchronous communication (without requiring both participants to be online at the same time). It implements communication features on a decentralized anonymizing datastore built on a friend-to-friend structure. This avoids the problems inherent in other solutions.
All of Freenet is Free Software licensed under GPL-compatible licenses. You can find additional information onhttps://freenetproject.org
The financial administration is managed by Freenet Project Inc., a US-based 503(c) non-profit. The project is financed by donations, from other organizations and from regular users. This proposal is sent on behalf of the community. The funding plan is cleared not only with other developers but also with the users.
This proposal is written for 800.000$ because many experienced Freenet developers are based in Europe and we cannot predict the exchange rate between Euro and Dollar, so we need to leave some room to ensure that we can pay the salaries if the Euro should become stronger.
For somewhat confidential inquiries, contact firstname.lastname@example.org (these will not be posted in a public place).
You can contact us publicly by sending an email to email@example.com or by joining the IRC channel #freenet @irc.freenode.net
My GnuPG/PGP key (for arne_bab -ät- web -punkt- de) is available from http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt with the fingerprint 6B05 41F0 94FF 2163 6FBA 2433 3307 469B FE96C404
Freenet currently is at a point where the technical backend is working well and provides features not found in any other program, while the user interface suffers from a large number of annoyances. Different from new projects which have been emerging in the past years, Freenet does not need uncertain research or large reshaping to be suitable for a situation of ubiquious surveillance. What it needs are improvements in workflows and integration. These are tasks which can be done without facing much uncertainty, but they need focused effort.
To ensure sustainability we will keep development infrastructure distributed: Freenet must not be dependent upon infrastructure we use for this project. Freenet will continue after the project ends, so the features developed during the project will stay available.
The European Copyright directive threatens online communication in Europe.
But thanks to massive shared action earlier this year, the European parliament can still prevent the problems. For each of the articles there are proposals which fix them. The parliamentarians (MEPs) just have to vote for them. And since they are under massive pressure from large media companies, that went as far as defaming those who took action as fake people, the MEPs need to hear your voice to know that your are real.
If you care about the future of the Internet in the EU, please Call your MEPs.