climate change

Two visions of our future

storm shelter or forestry
    by Mike Perry (http://nodicemike.com)

Update 2018-09-03: As by Aengenheyster et al. 2018, we’re now at “⚀ or ⚁” (1 or 2): »However, reaching the 1.5 K target appears unlikely as MM would be required to start in 2018 for a probability of 67%.« MM means getting a 2% increase of the share of renewables every year.

I don’t know what we rolled, but I sure hope it’s not a 1.1

For the robust science behind the green future, see Hansen et al. 2017:

Young people's burden: requirement of negative CO₂ emissions.


  1. Not every place will become this uninhabitable. But almost every place will have huge adaptation cost. See Hansen et al. 2016. Let’s hope we rolled a 2-6; and let’s stop ruining our odds. We need to go green. 

arctic unraveling

Report: Arctic Is Unraveling, discusses assessment Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost, notes the article rising tide — sounds more like Hansen was right.

comment on scientific consensus: distorting a debate to hide the majority view

I just discussed with “sceptics” on twitter about climate change. There Ronan Connolly ‏(@RonanConnolly) showed me his article which tries to give the impression that there is no scientific consensus about climate change being man-made.

Inhalt abgleichen
Willkommen im Weltenwald!
((λ()'Dr.ArneBab))



Beliebte Inhalte

sn.1w6.org news

Kommunikation im Internet ist in Gefahr!

Liebe Besucher,
leider müssen wir euch kurz unterbrechen:

Das EU-Parlament stimmt nächste Woche über eine Urheberrechtsreform ab,
die alle kleinen Kommunikationsplattformen in ihrer Existenz bedroht.

Offener Brief der Forenbetreiber

Wir bitten euch daher darum, dass ihr

Vielen Dank für eure Unterstützung!

Euer Draketo

Wir sind Teil des #321EUOfflineDay